The nineteenth-century ideas of the Ecuadorian legislator: criminal policy and intent on COIP reform

Main Article Content

Ví­ctor Vicente Vásconez Merelo

Abstract



Far away is the Ecuadorian criminal policy of complying with adequate standards of scientificity. Then as the politician on duty seems to legislate with yesterday’s newspaper in his hand. In this paper, two issues are criticized in particular. First, the contradictory criminal policy of the Ecuadorian legislator is highlighted by taking sides with one of the most guaranteed theories of men’s rea of intent. At the same time, in the same legal body Reform, the legislature is legislated to expose to public light, which has been apprehended in flagrant crime (fashion crimes), and thus the judge has validated. Secondly, that is, in the second chapter of the work, the failures of the theory of the will of men’s rea that was adopted by the legislator are analyzed critically, together with the critical analysis of the rest of theories that dominate the scientific discussion nowadays. Finally, it will be concluded that the legislator was openly contradictory in his criminal policy and that the theory of the will of men’s rea. However, it offers very high respect for the dignity of the human being, and that is why it constitutes the most guarantee theory, this does not mean that in theoretical or procedural terms, it is the most rational and suitable for which the Ecuadorian legislator could have inclined.


JEL CODE: K14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vásconez Merelo, V. V. (2020). The nineteenth-century ideas of the Ecuadorian legislator: criminal policy and intent on COIP reform. Revista De La Facultad De Jurisprudencia., 1(7), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.26807/rfj.v7i7.228
Section
Original article (research)

References

CORCOY BIDASOLO, M. (2008). El delito imprudente. Criterios de imputación del resultado, segunda edición. Montevideo- Buenos Aires: B de F.
FEIJíƒ"O SíNCHEZ, B. (2002). El dolo eventual. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
FEUERBACH, A. V. (1989). Tratado de Derecho Penal Común vigente en Alemania. Buenos Aires: Hammurabi.
HERZBERG, R. D. (1987) NJW. Citado por Ragués I Vallés, R. (1999). í¢€Å“El dolo y su prueba en el proceso penalí¢€. Barcelona: Bosch.
LESCH, H. H. (2001). Injusto y culpabilidad en derecho penal. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
MUíƒ"˜OZ CONDE, F. y GARCíA ARíN, M. (2010). Derecho Penal Parte General (8 a ed.). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
PUPPE, I. NK SS 15, n. marg. 61. Citada por Ragués I Vallés, R. (1999). í¢€Å“El dolo y su prueba en el proceso penalí¢€. Barcelona: Bosch.
PLASCENCIA VILLANUEVA, R. (2004). Evolución de la teorí­a del dolo. México D.F.: Instituto de investigaciones jurí­dicas de la UNAM.
RAGUíƒ"°S I VALLíƒ"°S, R. (1999). El dolo y su prueba en el proceso penal. Barcelona: Bosch.
ROXIN, C. (1999). Derecho Penal Parte General, trad. Diego Manuel Luzón Peña, Miguel Dí­az y Garcí­a Conlledo y Javier de Vicente Remesal. Madrid: Civitas.
: - (1997). Derecho Penal, Parte general. Fundamentos. La estructura de la teorí­a del delito, tomo I. Madrid: Civitas.
RUSCONI, M. (2016). Derecho Penal Parte General (3a ed.). Buenos Aires: Ad-hoc.
SíNCHEZ MíLAGA, A. (2016). í¢€Å“El dolo: í‚¿Fenómeno espiritual o atribución normativa?í¢€. THEMIS, ISSN: 1810-9934.
WELZEL, H. (1956). Derecho Penal Parte General, trad. Carlos Fontán Balestra. Buenos Aires: Roque De Palma.