Teaching Law as a Space of Conflict in a Diverse Society: Contributions to Debate
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 30, 2018
Keywords:
Ecuador, power, law, Higher Education, andragogy
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present text seeks to contribute with elements of analysis regarding the role of the law schools of Ecuador as spaces of construction and reproduction of forms of power that could conspire, through its contents and practices, with a system of social changes. The hypothesis that handles this work is that, when analyzing the practices like Faculties, and the social mechanisms that are generated in the legal practices, what is done is to have a formal and functional legal system but in the practical sense perpetuates the errors and Vices that at least in theory, teachers of law supposed to fight, all this in the middle of a conflict between continuity of change, signified between the more traditional positivism, and critical schools.
KEY WORDS: Ecuador, power, Law, Higher Education, andragogy.
JEL CODE: F51, D74
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Guerrero Salgado, E. E. (2018). Teaching Law as a Space of Conflict in a Diverse Society: Contributions to Debate. Revista De La Facultad De Jurisprudencia., 1(3), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.26807/rfj.v0i3.38
Section
Original article (research)
References
Almog, S. (2003). On Law and Utopia: Rules vs. Principles? í¢€" A Comment on Ramiro Avilésí¢€â„¢s Reply. Utopian Studies, 14, 143-148.
ívila Lizán, L. (2008). Acceso a la justicia y emancipación social. In R. (. ívila Santamaría, Neoconstitucionalismo y Sociedad (pp. 163-216). Quito, Ecuador: Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos.
Avilés, R. (2003). On Law and Utopia: A Reply to Shulamit Almog. Utopian Studies, 14(1), 133-142.
Binder, A. (2002). La fragmentación de la profesión judicial y la uniformidad de la carrera judicial. Santiago, Chile: CEJA.
Bobbio, N. (2001). Liberalismo y democracia. México D.F., México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Camps, V. (1998). Evolución y características de los derechos humanos. Los fundamentos de los derechos humanos desde la filosofía y el derecho. Madrid, España: Colectivo EDAI.
Chase, L. E. (2002). La reforma del Estado. In J. Fernández Ruiz, Perspectivas del Derecho Administrativo en el Siglo XXI (pp. 151-162). México, D.F., México: UNAM.
Christie, G. (1987, Abril). The Recruitment of Law Faculty. Duke Law Journal, 306-316.
Ferrajoli, L. (1999). Derecho y Garantías, la Ley del más Débil. Madrid, España: Trotta.
Ferrajoli, L. (2013). Poderes salvajes: la crisis de la democracia constitucional. Madrid: Trotta.
Ferry, J. (1868, septiembre 23). Lamentables etudes du droit. Le Temps, p. 3.
Kelsen, H. (1992). Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. (B. Litschewski Paulson, & S. Pau, Trans.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Medina, D. (2004). Teoría impura del derecho: la transformación de la cultura jurídica latinoamericana. Bogotá, Colombia: Legis.
Melin, G., & Janson, K. (2006). What skills and knowledge should a PhD have? Changing preconditions for PhD education and post doc work. In U. (. Teichler, The Formative Years of Scholars, Wenner-Gren International Studies (pp. 105-117). Londres: Portland Press.
Oí‚´Donnell, G. (2010). Revisitando el concepto de democracia delegativa. Casa del Tiempo, III(31), 1-8.
Pearce, R. G. (1998). Teaching Ethics Seriously: Legal Ethics as the Most Important Subject in Law School. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 29(4), 719-739.
Pollit, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2010). La reforma de la gestión púbica, un análisis comparado. (I. N. Pública, Ed.) Madrid, España: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.
Rivadeneyra, M. (1847). Los códigos españoles, concordados y anotados: Liber iudicium ..., Volumen 1. Madrid: Imprenta de la Publicidad.
Savage, J. (2008). The Social Function of the Law Faculty: Demographics, Republican Reform, and Professional Training at the Paris Law Faculty, 1870-1914. History of Education Quarterly, 48(2), 221í¢€"243.
Schiltz, P. (1998). Legal Ethics in Decline: The Elite Law Firm, the Elite Law School, and the Moral Formation of the Novice Attorney. Minnsesota Law Reviwe(705), 746-787.
Shaffer, A., & Shaffer, R. (1960). The Law, Faculty Desegregation and Social Change. Phylon, 31(1), 38-47.
Simon, F., & Navas, M. (2003). Diagnóstico de la enseñanza legal de los Derechos Humanos en el Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Universidad San Francisco de Quito.
Thorseson, R. (1984). The Professor at Risk: Alcohol Abuse in Academe. The Journal of Higher Education, 55(1), 56-72.
Tremblay, R. (2016, noviembre 11). Humankindí¢€â„¢s future: social and political Utopia or Idiocracy? Retrieved from OpEdNews : http://www. opednews.com/articles/Humankind-s-future-social-by-Roland-Michel-Trem-091101-248.html
University of California, Berkeley. (2014). Top Predictors of Graduate Student Well-Being. Universidad de Berkeley. Universidad de Berkeley
Yudkowsky, E. (2007). Three major singularity schools. Retrieved diciembre 30, 2016, from Singularities: http://yudkowsky.net/singularity/schools
ívila Lizán, L. (2008). Acceso a la justicia y emancipación social. In R. (. ívila Santamaría, Neoconstitucionalismo y Sociedad (pp. 163-216). Quito, Ecuador: Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos.
Avilés, R. (2003). On Law and Utopia: A Reply to Shulamit Almog. Utopian Studies, 14(1), 133-142.
Binder, A. (2002). La fragmentación de la profesión judicial y la uniformidad de la carrera judicial. Santiago, Chile: CEJA.
Bobbio, N. (2001). Liberalismo y democracia. México D.F., México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Camps, V. (1998). Evolución y características de los derechos humanos. Los fundamentos de los derechos humanos desde la filosofía y el derecho. Madrid, España: Colectivo EDAI.
Chase, L. E. (2002). La reforma del Estado. In J. Fernández Ruiz, Perspectivas del Derecho Administrativo en el Siglo XXI (pp. 151-162). México, D.F., México: UNAM.
Christie, G. (1987, Abril). The Recruitment of Law Faculty. Duke Law Journal, 306-316.
Ferrajoli, L. (1999). Derecho y Garantías, la Ley del más Débil. Madrid, España: Trotta.
Ferrajoli, L. (2013). Poderes salvajes: la crisis de la democracia constitucional. Madrid: Trotta.
Ferry, J. (1868, septiembre 23). Lamentables etudes du droit. Le Temps, p. 3.
Kelsen, H. (1992). Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. (B. Litschewski Paulson, & S. Pau, Trans.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Medina, D. (2004). Teoría impura del derecho: la transformación de la cultura jurídica latinoamericana. Bogotá, Colombia: Legis.
Melin, G., & Janson, K. (2006). What skills and knowledge should a PhD have? Changing preconditions for PhD education and post doc work. In U. (. Teichler, The Formative Years of Scholars, Wenner-Gren International Studies (pp. 105-117). Londres: Portland Press.
Oí‚´Donnell, G. (2010). Revisitando el concepto de democracia delegativa. Casa del Tiempo, III(31), 1-8.
Pearce, R. G. (1998). Teaching Ethics Seriously: Legal Ethics as the Most Important Subject in Law School. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 29(4), 719-739.
Pollit, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2010). La reforma de la gestión púbica, un análisis comparado. (I. N. Pública, Ed.) Madrid, España: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.
Rivadeneyra, M. (1847). Los códigos españoles, concordados y anotados: Liber iudicium ..., Volumen 1. Madrid: Imprenta de la Publicidad.
Savage, J. (2008). The Social Function of the Law Faculty: Demographics, Republican Reform, and Professional Training at the Paris Law Faculty, 1870-1914. History of Education Quarterly, 48(2), 221í¢€"243.
Schiltz, P. (1998). Legal Ethics in Decline: The Elite Law Firm, the Elite Law School, and the Moral Formation of the Novice Attorney. Minnsesota Law Reviwe(705), 746-787.
Shaffer, A., & Shaffer, R. (1960). The Law, Faculty Desegregation and Social Change. Phylon, 31(1), 38-47.
Simon, F., & Navas, M. (2003). Diagnóstico de la enseñanza legal de los Derechos Humanos en el Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Universidad San Francisco de Quito.
Thorseson, R. (1984). The Professor at Risk: Alcohol Abuse in Academe. The Journal of Higher Education, 55(1), 56-72.
Tremblay, R. (2016, noviembre 11). Humankindí¢€â„¢s future: social and political Utopia or Idiocracy? Retrieved from OpEdNews : http://www. opednews.com/articles/Humankind-s-future-social-by-Roland-Michel-Trem-091101-248.html
University of California, Berkeley. (2014). Top Predictors of Graduate Student Well-Being. Universidad de Berkeley. Universidad de Berkeley
Yudkowsky, E. (2007). Three major singularity schools. Retrieved diciembre 30, 2016, from Singularities: http://yudkowsky.net/singularity/schools